mirror of
https://github.com/permissionlesstech/bitchat.git
synced 2026-08-22 07:16:03 +00:00
2a9fb4d53f
* Make SwiftLint blocking in CI now that the violation backlog is zero The lint job has been advisory since #1361, with the backlog tracked in #1088. That backlog is now down to 28 violations, so this clears it and flips the job to enforcing instead of adding baseline machinery: - Fix all remaining violations: closure parameters/capture lists joined onto their opening-brace line (BLEService, NoiseSessionManager, ChatMediaTransferCoordinator, BLENoisePacketHandlerTests), one trailing comma, one opening-brace spacing (both via swiftlint --fix). - Move the two periphery:ignore comments above the doc blocks they were orphaning; verified with a periphery --strict scan that the commands still register (no new findings vs baseline). - Disable the todo rule: the single TODO cites tracked issue #1434 and is a deliberate marker, not lint debt. - Exclude .device-lab from local runs (untracked; CI never sees it). - CI: drop continue-on-error and the "(advisory)" label; run with --strict so any new warning fails the job. Full SwiftPM suite green (2,004 tests / 216 suites) after the formatting changes; swiftlint lint --strict exits 0 with the same 0.65.0 the CI container pins. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fix is_disjoint violation introduced by #1542 The strict lint gate caught this on its first run: the mention-suggestion key handler used modifierFlags.intersection([...]).isEmpty, which is exactly the pattern isDisjoint(with:) expresses directly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: jack <jackjackbits@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>