mirror of
https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome.git
synced 2026-08-31 07:30:32 +00:00
295886cb9a
* feat(artwork): report what a config-fingerprint backfill enqueued A backfill re-resolves every entity, and on a large library that is tens of thousands of external agent calls. It announced itself with a single line carrying nothing but an elapsed time, so the size of the job was invisible until the request volume showed up hours later. Log the item count, the per-kind breakdown, and a ceiling on the external lookups the queued work can cost. The ceiling reuses ExternalLookupsPerItem, the same estimator behind the `artwork reprocess` preview, so the two agree on what an item can cost. backfill now returns a summary instead of a bare bool, which keeps the counts assertable without capturing log output. Worker.Backfill keeps its (bool, error) signature, so its caller is unchanged, and it reads the agent count off its own resolver. * refactor(artwork): share the image-agent count and take it lazily Counting image agents was written twice, once in the CLI for the `artwork reprocess` preview and again as a resolver method for the backfill log. Two copies of "which agents count as image agents" can drift, and the CLI estimate and the server log would then disagree silently. Move the derivation next to the type it builds, as NewImageAgentCount, and call it from both. The resolver method goes away with it: hanging the census on the resolver forced two nil guards that its only caller could never trigger, because Worker always builds a resolver with agents. The Worker keeps the *agents.Agents it is already handed instead of reaching through the processor and resolver to find it. Pass the count as a func. Building the agent list constructs every enabled agent (each one an HTTP client and a cache goroutine) only to take its length, and a backfill returns early on an unchanged fingerprint, which is what happens on nearly every restart. * docs(artwork): say what the backfill lookup estimate does not bound The comment called the number a ceiling, which the CLI comment on the same estimate already contradicts: externalEstimate "claims no bound". Both are right about the local-source case and only one of them mentions that a retried item asks its agents again.